Anyone observing the opening of
the new UK Parliament session yesterday will have been aware of the fatuous flummery of
absurd rituals. But this is just window dressing, complete with garters, for a
more fundamental point: all new members of Parliament must give an Oath of
Allegiance to the Crown or else they cannot take their seats. Nobody thinks
that the Queen runs Parliament, but this oath acts as a shorthand way by which
patriotism and solidarity with the British state is expressed, no matter which
government is in power.
The Oath takes one of two forms.
The most commonly used is:
I, [member’s name], swear by Almighty God that I will be
faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and
successors, according to law. So help me God.
For those whose belief in the
Almighty is a little shaky, but who still believe in the majesty of the British
state, the version is:
I, [member’s name], do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm
that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen
Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law.
Being an atheist is now OK, but
failing to have the correct national faith is not.
So it is that the Irish
republican party, Sinn Féin, boycotts the House of Commons, despite having won
seats in the British Parliament. As Mary Lou McDonald, the leader of Sinn Féin,
put it, party members would not be willing to ‘swear an oath to a foreign
power’.
Jeremy Corbyn, soon to be not
leader of the Labour Party, and all other sitting MPs have taken the Oath. But
that did not stop him being criticised for failing to pay attention to the
Queen’s speech on Christmas Day. This was a sure sign of insufficient
patriotism, and one to be included with his other alleged misdemeanours in the vox
pop media interviews at the time of the General Election.
The political climate that all
this suggests is pretty bad. It gets worse still when you consider the
mentality that must underlie the singing of the National Anthem at all big
events, especially in sports.
Study the main verse of this
obsequious dirge and weep:
God save our gracious Queen!
Long live our noble Queen!
God save the Queen!
Send her victorious,
Happy and glorious,
Long to reign over us,
God save the Queen.
However, it does not take much
deciphering to see that this is not really an expression of undying love for
the monarch, although you will not get far in Britain without showing due
deference. It is the hope that h/she will persist, but as the head of a
victorious, happy and glorious country of ‘us’. The eternal reign – eternal
because the Anthem is applied to succeeding monarchs – is therefore a deep,
patriotic wish that British power will persist too, and that its magic will
enrich all loyal subjects.
British citizens want to count
themselves as beneficiaries of such magic and will sing the Anthem. It is an
incantation, an expression of exaggerated pride and bolstered self-confidence
to give hope for a better future for ‘us’. It is no wonder that their members
of Parliament have to take the Oath of Allegiance.
Tony,
ReplyDeleteWell written.
And what about the allegiance of the English working to the English Football team?
When they, like the politicians are stuck in national chauvinism, how can you expect them to fight against Imperialism.
Let’s all now support the Scottish National team and hope Celtic become the Barcelona of Scotland
Stuart
So is supporting the local football team even worse than supporting the national football team and is supporting your kids very local team the worse form of chauvinism and parochialism possible?
ReplyDeletePersonally I can juggle football support with anti imperialism no problem.
Hi Steve,
ReplyDeleteI strongly recommend you keep supporting your local football team and your kids(children’s) team.
Also you should play football and any other sports and coach junior teams as I do.
But if you go to an England game and I purposely have not gone for several years, you will view racism and jingoism.
So please don’t support England