Posts
With the British ruling elites
tearing themselves apart over foreign policy these days (regarding the European
Union), I thought I would take a brief look back into happier times. Here are
some choice quotations from major politicians and newspapers that stressed how
much Britain’s position in the world produced big benefits.
First, Winston Churchill in
April 1929. He is talking in Parliament about the City’s revenues, and its role
as a global broker, as well as the big returns on British foreign investments:
“The income which we derive each year from commissions and
services rendered to foreign countries is over £65,000,000, and, in addition,
we have a steady revenue from foreign investments of close on £300,000,000 a
year, 90 per cent of which is expressed in sterling. Upon this great influx
there is levied, as a rule, the highest rates of taxation. In this way we are
helped to maintain our social services at a level incomparably higher than that
of any European country, or indeed of any country.”
Note that both kinds of revenue
do not all come from the colonies, at least not directly, and most will have
derived from transactions with and investments in other major countries.
Nevertheless, such revenues were important for social services even before the
post-1945 ‘welfare state’. I give an updated, contemporary assessment of these
in my book, The City.
After 1945, the British Empire
was somewhat diminished, as was its investment and dealing revenues. However,
these remained important. As Ernest Bevin, the Labour Foreign Secretary, put it
to the House of Commons in February 1946, stressing the importance of imperial
stability as well as the revenues coming from the Empire:
“When I say I am not prepared to sacrifice the British
Empire, what do I mean? I know that if the British Empire fell, the greatest
collection of free nations would go into the limbo of the past, and it would be
a disaster. I know, further, it would mean that the standard of life of our constituents
would fall considerably.”
This concern about the ‘standard
of life’ of British constituents was a key point for Labour’s social
imperialism, and tallied with the views of the arch imperialist Churchill.
The importance of the Empire was
also stressed in major UK newspapers at the time, for example in noting how US
dollar-based earnings from the exports of commodities from Malaya (later
Malaysia) were important for keeping Britain’s Sterling Area financial system
in place:
“It is Malaya’s dollar earnings which keep the sterling area
afloat.” (Manchester Guardian, 13 December 1950)
and
“Malaya is Britain’s biggest source of American dollars.” (The
Times, 9 June 1950)
Malaya, of course, did not have
access to these dollars, which were deposited in London, and from which, in
general, only the UK and the ‘white’ dominions could draw. Malaya saw its funds
translated into (depreciating) sterling and had to use this sterling to buy
British goods.
Professor W Arthur Lewis summed
it up in a Financial Times article, ‘The Colonies and Sterling’ in 1952:
“Many Colonies must sell their produce to Britain at prices
below the world price, and, through exchange control, must buy from Britain at
prices above the world price, or pay an ever-increasing sum into the Bank of
England, because Britain will not deliver goods in return for what she
receives.
“Britain talks of colonial development, but on the contrary,
it is African and Malayan peasants who are putting capital into Britain. … The
British colonial system has become a major means of economic exploitation. …
“The Colonies are exporting far more than they import, and
are building up large balances. They cannot get all the imports they need,
especially of capital goods, and their development programmes are in consequence
retarded. They are in effect paying Britain for goods which she does not
deliver.”[1]
His only error in this was to
say that the colonial system ‘has become’ a major means of exploitation,
whereas it had always been one. Other examples of Britain’s colonial
exploitation post-1945 are given in my articles on Labour’s colonial policy and on how the welfare state was funded in 1945.
Tony Norfield, 18 July 2018
[1] Cited in R Palme
Dutt, The Crisis of Britain and the British Empire, Lawrence &
Wishart, 1953. The Manchester Guardian and Times quotations
are also from Dutt. The remainder are from Hansard.
